Div. III Independents Baseball 2009
Team Statistics
Overall Statistics
Div. III Independents Baseball 2009
Conference Overall Statistics (as of May 26, 2009)
(All games Sorted by Batting avg)
Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD%
Chapman University.. .340 49 1787 403 608 118 13 46 363 890 .498 155 55 185 22 .404 29 46 76-89 1307 533 56 .970
Nebraska Wesleyan... .333 41 1167 289 389 75 8 25 263 555 .476 152 40 215 27 .423 15 39 31-47 861 324 73 .942
St. Joseph's (N.Y.). .321 33 996 265 320 62 9 9 225 427 .429 158 43 183 9 .429 18 9 93-122 691 241 95 .907
University of Dallas .303 37 1111 249 337 61 10 24 224 490 .441 180 54 202 11 .420 13 28 49-70 843 396 64 .951
Cal State East Bay.. .276 40 1359 236 375 69 6 17 196 507 .373 138 50 231 19 .360 19 21 66-88 1047 456 50 .968
Lancaster Bible..... .245 33 940 178 230 49 3 20 157 345 .367 151 23 212 6 .358 14 13 44-56 702 287 92 .915
Finlandia University .213 30 774 70 165 23 2 9 62 219 .283 65 9 241 6 .280 5 10 22-28 576 251 87 .905
(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)
Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA
University of Dallas 4.55 21-15 37 17 3/0 2 281.0 274 184 142 120 243 42 7 14 1087 .252 46 27 5 12 16
Chapman University.. 4.89 32-17 49 9 1/0 15 436.0 478 275 237 188 334 84 7 35 1697 .282 36 56 2 17 24
Cal State East Bay.. 4.90 16-24 40 4 2/1 5 349.0 384 230 190 144 229 68 6 32 1359 .283 28 53 7 13 20
Nebraska Wesleyan... 5.08 28-13 41 21 5/0 5 287.0 335 219 162 110 185 53 11 14 1171 .286 36 48 2 18 23
St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 6.84 12-21 33 5 1/0 0 230.1 292 241 175 136 201 44 14 15 993 .294 37 35 6 17 10
Lancaster Bible..... 8.38 14-18 33 13 2/0 2 234.0 327 278 218 152 160 60 12 23 1035 .316 30 41 3 13 9
Finlandia University 13.27 2-28 30 11 0/0 0 192.0 394 376 283 153 95 87 8 24 961 .410 32 57 1 30 6
(All games Sorted by Fielding pct)
Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI
Chapman University.. 1896 1307 533 56 .970 37 49 21 .700 9 0
Cal State East Bay.. 1553 1047 456 50 .968 30 39 12 .765 3 1
University of Dallas 1303 843 396 64 .951 20 35 5 .875 11 0
Nebraska Wesleyan... 1258 861 324 73 .942 21 44 21 .677 10 0
Lancaster Bible..... 1081 702 287 92 .915 12 52 18 .743 12 0
St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 1027 691 241 95 .907 12 67 6 .918 15 0
Finlandia University 914 576 251 87 .905 12 51 9 .850 15 0
Category Leaders
Div. III Independents Baseball 2009
Conference Batting Leaders (as of May 26, 2009)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1 Games 50% of Games 2.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Batting avg
-----------
1. Chapman University.. .340
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... .333
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). .321
4. University of Dallas .303
5. Cal State East Bay.. .276
Slugging pct
------------
1. Chapman University.. .498
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... .476
3. University of Dallas .441
4. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). .429
5. Cal State East Bay.. .373
On base pct
-----------
1. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). .429
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... .423
3. University of Dallas .420
4. Chapman University.. .404
5. Cal State East Bay.. .360
Runs scored
-----------
1. Chapman University.. 403
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 289
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 265
4. University of Dallas 249
5. Cal State East Bay.. 236
Hits
----
1. Chapman University.. 608
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 389
3. Cal State East Bay.. 375
4. University of Dallas 337
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 320
Runs batted in
--------------
1. Chapman University.. 363
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 263
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 225
4. University of Dallas 224
5. Cal State East Bay.. 196
Doubles
-------
1. Chapman University.. 118
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 75
3. Cal State East Bay.. 69
4. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 62
5. University of Dallas 61
Triples
-------
1. Chapman University.. 13
2. University of Dallas 10
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 9
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 8
5. Cal State East Bay.. 6
Home runs
---------
1. Chapman University.. 46
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 25
3. University of Dallas 24
4. Lancaster Bible..... 20
5. Cal State East Bay.. 17
Total bases
-----------
1. Chapman University.. 890
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 555
3. Cal State East Bay.. 507
4. University of Dallas 490
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 427
Total plate appearances
-----------------------
1. Chapman University.. 2072
2. Cal State East Bay.. 1591
3. Nebraska Wesleyan... 1413
4. University of Dallas 1386
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 1225
At bats
-------
1. Chapman University.. 1787
2. Cal State East Bay.. 1359
3. Nebraska Wesleyan... 1167
4. University of Dallas 1111
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 996
Walks
-----
1. University of Dallas 180
2. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 158
3. Chapman University.. 155
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 152
5. Lancaster Bible..... 151
Hit by pitch
------------
1. Chapman University.. 55
2. University of Dallas 54
3. Cal State East Bay.. 50
4. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 43
5. Nebraska Wesleyan... 40
Strikeouts
----------
1. Finlandia University 241
2. Cal State East Bay.. 231
3. Nebraska Wesleyan... 215
4. Lancaster Bible..... 212
5. University of Dallas 202
Sac bunts
---------
1. Chapman University.. 46
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 39
3. University of Dallas 28
4. Cal State East Bay.. 21
5. Lancaster Bible..... 13
Sac flies
---------
1. Chapman University.. 29
2. Cal State East Bay.. 19
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 18
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 15
5. Lancaster Bible..... 14
Stolen bases
------------
1. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 93
2. Chapman University.. 76
3. Cal State East Bay.. 66
4. University of Dallas 49
5. Lancaster Bible..... 44
Caught stealing
---------------
1. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 29
2. Cal State East Bay.. 22
3. University of Dallas 21
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 16
5. Chapman University.. 13
Steal attempts
--------------
1. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 122
2. Chapman University.. 89
3. Cal State East Bay.. 88
4. University of Dallas 70
5. Lancaster Bible..... 56
Grounded into DP
----------------
1. Nebraska Wesleyan... 27
2. Chapman University.. 22
3. Cal State East Bay.. 19
4. University of Dallas 11
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 9
Div. III Independents Baseball 2009
Conference Pitching Leaders (as of May 26, 2009)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1 Games 50% of Games 2.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Earned run avg
--------------
1. University of Dallas 4.55
2. Chapman University.. 4.89
3. Cal State East Bay.. 4.90
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 5.08
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 6.84
Opposing bat avg
----------------
1. University of Dallas .252
2. Chapman University.. .282
3. Cal State East Bay.. .283
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... .286
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). .294
Innings pitched
---------------
1. Chapman University.. 436.0
2. Cal State East Bay.. 349.0
3. Nebraska Wesleyan... 287.0
4. University of Dallas 281.0
5. Lancaster Bible..... 234.0
Batters struck out
------------------
1. Chapman University.. 334
2. University of Dallas 243
3. Cal State East Bay.. 229
4. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 201
5. Nebraska Wesleyan... 185
Batters SO out looking
----------------------
1. Chapman University.. 106
2. Cal State East Bay.. 85
3. University of Dallas 68
4. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 61
5. Nebraska Wesleyan... 59
Wins
----
1. Chapman University.. 32
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 28
3. University of Dallas 21
4. Cal State East Bay.. 16
5. Lancaster Bible..... 14
Losses
------
1. Finlandia University 28
2. Cal State East Bay.. 24
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 21
4. Lancaster Bible..... 18
5. Chapman University.. 17
Saves
-----
1. Chapman University.. 15
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 5
Cal State East Bay.. 5
4. University of Dallas 2
Lancaster Bible..... 2
Runners picked off
------------------
1. University of Dallas 13
2. Chapman University.. 11
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 8
4. Lancaster Bible..... 7
5. Cal State East Bay.. 5
Sac bunts allowed
-----------------
1. Chapman University.. 24
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 23
3. Cal State East Bay.. 20
4. University of Dallas 16
5. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 10
Sac flies allowed
-----------------
1. Finlandia University 30
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 18
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 17
Chapman University.. 17
5. 2 tied at........... 13
Hits allowed
------------
1. University of Dallas 274
2. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 292
3. Lancaster Bible..... 327
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 335
5. Cal State East Bay.. 384
Runs allowed
------------
1. University of Dallas 184
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 219
3. Cal State East Bay.. 230
4. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 241
5. Chapman University.. 275
Earned runs allowed
-------------------
1. University of Dallas 142
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 162
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 175
4. Cal State East Bay.. 190
5. Lancaster Bible..... 218
Walks allowed
-------------
1. Nebraska Wesleyan... 110
2. University of Dallas 120
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 136
4. Cal State East Bay.. 144
5. Lancaster Bible..... 152
Doubles allowed
---------------
1. University of Dallas 42
2. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 44
3. Nebraska Wesleyan... 53
4. Lancaster Bible..... 60
5. Cal State East Bay.. 68
Triples allowed
---------------
1. Cal State East Bay.. 6
2. University of Dallas 7
Chapman University.. 7
4. Finlandia University 8
5. Nebraska Wesleyan... 11
Home runs allowed
-----------------
1. Nebraska Wesleyan... 14
University of Dallas 14
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 15
4. Lancaster Bible..... 23
5. Finlandia University 24
Wild pitches
------------
1. University of Dallas 46
2. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 37
3. Chapman University.. 36
Nebraska Wesleyan... 36
5. Finlandia University 32
Balks
-----
1. Cal State East Bay.. 7
2. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 6
3. University of Dallas 5
4. Lancaster Bible..... 3
5. 2 tied at........... 2
Hit batters
-----------
1. Finlandia University 57
2. Chapman University.. 56
3. Cal State East Bay.. 53
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 48
5. Lancaster Bible..... 41
Intentional BB allowed
----------------------
1. Cal State East Bay.. 5636
2. Nebraska Wesleyan... 3332
3. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 1537
4. Chapman University.. 17
5. Finlandia University 16
Div. III Independents Baseball 2009
Conference Fielding Leaders (as of May 26, 2009)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1 Games 50% of Games
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Fielding pct
------------
1. Chapman University.. .970
2. Cal State East Bay.. .968
3. University of Dallas .951
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... .942
5. Lancaster Bible..... .915
Chances
-------
1. Chapman University.. 1896
2. Cal State East Bay.. 1553
3. University of Dallas 1303
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 1258
5. Lancaster Bible..... 1081
Putouts
-------
1. Chapman University.. 1307
2. Cal State East Bay.. 1047
3. Nebraska Wesleyan... 861
4. University of Dallas 843
5. Lancaster Bible..... 702
Assists
-------
1. Chapman University.. 533
2. Cal State East Bay.. 456
3. University of Dallas 396
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 324
5. Lancaster Bible..... 287
Errors
------
1. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 95
2. Lancaster Bible..... 92
3. Finlandia University 87
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 73
5. University of Dallas 64
Fielding double plays
---------------------
1. Chapman University.. 37
2. Cal State East Bay.. 30
3. Nebraska Wesleyan... 21
4. University of Dallas 20
5. 3 tied at........... 12
Stolen bases against
--------------------
1. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 67
2. Lancaster Bible..... 52
3. Finlandia University 51
4. Chapman University.. 49
5. Nebraska Wesleyan... 44
Caught stealing by
------------------
1. Nebraska Wesleyan... 21
Chapman University.. 21
3. Lancaster Bible..... 18
4. Cal State East Bay.. 12
5. Finlandia University 9
Steal attempts against
----------------------
1. St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 73
2. Chapman University.. 70
Lancaster Bible..... 70
4. Nebraska Wesleyan... 65
5. Finlandia University 60
Passed balls
------------
1. Finlandia University 15
St. Joseph's (N.Y.). 15
3. Lancaster Bible..... 12
4. University of Dallas 11
5. Nebraska Wesleyan... 10
Catchers interference
---------------------
1. Cal State East Bay.. 1